Home

WHAT IS?

Public Domain
Copyright Exceptions
Copyright

PERMISSION WIZARDS
Public Domain
Copyright Exceptions
Licensing


INFORMATION
Glossary
Collectives
Copyright Links
Teachers

CONTENT REPOSITORY REPORTS

Content Stores
Needs Assessment
Pricing #1
Pricing #2
Environmental Scan of Pricing Models for Online Content
Report II
Business Models for Object Repositories


Prepared by Albert W. Darimont
http://www.darimont.ca

OnDisC Project
April 2002© OnDisC 2002


0. Executive Summary
1. Background 
2. Learning Object Repositories                                                           
3. Business Models - Value chain                                                          
4Funding Models                       
5. Discussion
6Conclusions
7Bibliography
8. Web Site References (Webliography)



6       Conclusions

The purpose of this report was to conduct research on the activities of electronic content stores or repositories across Canada and elsewhere at various levels including K-12, government and the private sector. The applicability to OnDisC of business and revenue models associated with the object repositories were reviewed and discussed. Some of the major findings of this research are:

·   There is a great deal of activity in Canada and elsewhere in research and development of Learning Object repositories and networks; there is a great opportunity for the OnDisC Alliance to use its digital content assets to help supply future demand for LOs.

·  Learning Object repositories are developing in both the public and private spheres; OnDisC may be able to act as a content supplier to both spheres.

·   OnDisC may need to consider multiple business/revenue models if targeting different markets, such as K-12, academic institutions and commercial content developers.OnDisC should consider active investigative research of the wants and needs of these markets.

·   OnDisC may need to consider a sequence of business/revenue models; during the initial implementation of OnDisC, stable revenue from committed sponsors may be most effective with subsequent revenue streams from users coming later.

·   Value chain assessments will be a valuable tool in helping OnDisC determine its contributions and subsequent rewards with respect to the value chain; this will be particularly helpful if multiple markets and business plans are considered.

·   Digitization of content will be a significant cost and risk factor for content contributing members; a just-in-time digitization model may be an effective way to compromise between service and risk.

·   OnDisC should contact and/or maintain a watch on educational content brokerage networks such as UNIVERSAL and Lydia for valuable information about business models in addition to the possibility of future business relationships. This may be of interest to the other Canadian content repositories such as BELLE and POOL.